|
1
|
- Moti Haim ,MD
- Cardiac Electrophysiology Service
- Belinson Campus
- Rabin Medical Center
|
|
2
|
- Pathophysiology-Mechanism of VT
- Mapping
- ECG Localization of VT Exit point
- Invasive mapping methods:
- Entrainment map
- Activation map
- Substrate mapping and ablation
- Management
|
|
3
|
- Reentry –Most Common mechanism
- Triggered Activity
- Increased Automaticity
|
|
4
|
- Requires:
- Slow Conduction
- Different Refractory Periods of adjacent myocardium
- Unidirectional block in one limb of the reentry circuit
- Scar provides perfect Substrate for block, slow conduction and variable
refractory characteristics
|
|
5
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
11
|
- Purpose of VT mapping
- Recognizing the Mechanism (crucial for successful ablation and medical
therapy)
- Localization
- Localization of the Critical Isthmus in Reentrant VT.
|
|
12
|
- Limited in Pathologic heart (non uniform propagation, barriers in scar)
- Provides General Guide to Source
- Provides Estimate of Exit point to myocardium of reentrant circuit and
does not provide data of rest of circuit
|
|
13
|
- Inferior Axis- Anterior wall
- Superior Axis- Inferior wall
- Q waves across precordium- Apical
- R waves in V1/V2 – Basal LV
- LBBB Usually Septal (or rarely RV/ARVD)
- Typical LBBB - think of BBR
(esepcially in non ischemic CMP)
- RBBB –Can be anywhere in LV (free wall/septum)
|
|
14
|
- Pathophysiology-Mechanism of Arrhythmia
- Mapping
- ECG Localization of VT
- InvasiveMapping Methods:
- Entrainment map
- Activation map
- Substrate mapping
- Management
|
|
15
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
- Pathophysiology-Mechanism of Arrhythmia
- Mapping
- ECG Localization of VT Exit point
- Invasive mapping methods:
- Entrainment map
- Activation map
- Substrate mapping and ablation
- Management
|
|
22
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
36
|
- Abnormal conduction is indicated by the presence of fractionated EGMs
comprised of multiple low amplitude potentials
- Discrete low amplitude potentials are sometimes due to depolarization of
an isthmus with surrounding areas of fixed block
- Late Potentials
- Limitation: Could be Innocent adjacent bystanders in scar
|
|
37
|
|
|
38
|
- Middiastolic/ presystolic potentials at least 50 ms early then QRS
(Josephson)
- An isolated, low amplitude, diastolic potential during VT potential is
often a marker of a narrow isthmus in a reentry circuit
- Entrainment mapping is essential for determining if the isolated
potential originates from the reentry circuit site as opposed to a
bystander.
|
|
39
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
43
|
- 1. Concealed Fusion – identical 12 lead ECG Morphology
- 2. PPI equals TCL (>=20 ms)
- 3. s-QRS = (>=20 ms)EGM-QRS
|
|
44
|
|
|
45
|
- If pacing within the protected isthmus the s-QRS should equal EGM-QRS
|
|
46
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
50
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
52
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
55
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
60
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
67
|
- The goal of the trial was to evaluate treatment with ICD implantation
with catheter ablation compared with ICD alone among post myocardial
infarction (MI) patients with sustained ventricular tachycardia (VT)/
ventricular fibrillation (VF)
|
|
68
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
71
|
- Among post-MI patients with sustained VT/VF, ICD implantation with
substrate-based catheter ablation was associated with a reduction in
appropriate ICD therapy through two years compared with ICD therapy
alone.
- The present trial suggests that the procedure can also be effective in
reducing ICD shocks in the post-MI setting, although it should be noted
that the procedure is difficult to perform and extremely technical, so
use for prophylactic therapy should be undertaken with caution and only
in experienced centers.
|
|
72
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
74
|
|