Notes
Slide Show
Outline
1
Moving targets for hyperlipidemia and hypertension
2
Burden of CVD and relation to RF
3
Potential Benefit of Blood Pressure and Cholesterol Lowering on Death
(per 10,000 Patient-Years)
4
Dyslipidemia Accounts for More Than Half of Acute MI Risk
5
Lipid-Lowering Therapy Accounted for Over 70% of Cardiovascular Risk Reduction in  Patients With Diabetes*
6
Cardiovascular Mortality Increases Sharply With Serum Cholesterol Concentration in Patients With Diabetes
7
הורדת כולסטרול מפחיתה סיכון !
8
 
9
 
10
 
11
 
12
LDL cholesterol goals according to risk factors group
13
 
14
Most patient with CAD have “normal” LDL
15
PROVE-IT: Primary End Point By 4-Month LDL Level (Multivariable Adjustment)*
16
PROVE IT: Clinical Outcome by 30-Day Achieved LDL and CRP Levels
17
 
18
 
19
Prevalence of IVUS-Detected
Coronary Artery Atherosclerosis
20
 
21
Relationship between LDL-C levels and change in percent atheroma volume for several IVUS trials
22
ASTEROID Trial: Principal Findings
23
 
24
מתי יש תועלת  ממתן  סטטינים  לאנשים עם LDL  נמוך  ?
25
Predictive Value of CRP and Other Inflammatory Markers: LDL <130 mg/dL
26
 
27
נתוני הבסיס  של החולים שנכללו בשתי הקבוצות ביופיטר
28
ערכי המעבדה  בשתי הקבוצות ללא טיפול
29
נתוני  בסיס בהשוואה למחקרים קודמים של מניעה ראשונית
30
התוצאות לאורך זמן
31
תוצאות המחקר בזמן הפסקתו
32
הNNT המשוערך  לזמן המקסימאלי
33
מרכיבי התוצאות
34
פירוט כמותי  של התוצאות.
35
תת קבוצות
36
תת קבוצות
37
התוצאה טובה מהמצופה!
38
התוצאה טובה מהמצופה !
39
גם תמותה כוללת פחתה!
40
תופעות לוואי
41
סטטינים וסוכרת חדשה
42
מי מועמד לטיפול בסטטינים למניעה ראשונית?
43
Lipid Treatment Guidelines: Which Diabetes Patients Should Be Treated?
44
 
45
Relationship between LDL-C levels and change in percent atheroma volume for several IVUS trials
46
 
47
השינוי בלחצי הדם עקב טורסטרפיב
48
Risk of cardiovascular disease events by hypertensive status in the Framingham Study
49
Impact of pulse pressure at specified levels of systolic blood pressure (Framingham)
50
Elevated SBP Increases CVD Mortality
51
 
52
Cardiovascular Mortality Risk with
20/10 mmHg Increments in SBP/DBP*
53
Lowering blood pressure reduces cardiovascular risk
54
 
55
Results of randomised trials of
antihypertensive drug therapy
56
ככל שהסיכון גבוה הטיפול בלחץ דם יעיל יותר
57
 
58
Reducing target-organ damage
59
Effects of Antihypertensive Drug Treatment on BP in Trials on Essential Hypertensive Patients
60
Effects of Antihypertensive Drug Treatment on BP in Trials on Essential Hypertensive Patients with Diabetes
61
Impact of High-Normal Blood Pressure on the Risk of Cardiovascular Disease
62
Strong heart study
63
Strong heart study
64
Number Needed to Treat (NNT) in UKPDS for BP and Blood Sugar Control: BP is More Important
65
 
66
 
67
Pharmacological Treatment of Prehypertension
68
Pharmacological Treatment of Prehypertension

TROPHY Trial:  Incidence of New-Onset Hypertension
69
NORMALISE Results—IVUS LOWESS Plots
70
 
71
 
72
 
73
Normal and Optimal Values of a Physiological Parameter
  • In the majority of physiological parameters optimal and normal values are equal:
    • e.g. – body temperature, serum Na etc

  • There are however parameters where normal values are significantly different from optimal:
    • BP, Lipids, Weight, Insulin resistance, Coagulation etc

  • As health care providers (society) we can either wait for nature to take it’s course or intervene early to optimize “normal” values
74
הגדרות    ESH
75
מתי  להתחיל טיפול תרופתי בלחץ דם?          (לפי (ESH
76
Target Values for Blood Pressure
77
Guidelines Recognise Growing Treatment Complexities and Recommend Tighter Control
78
AHA Scientific Statement:
Treatment of Hypertension in the Prevention
and Management of Ischemic Heart Disease
79
ABPM  by treatment for HTN
ואולי לא מזהים את כל מי שבסיכון?
80
Hypertension management:
Blood pressure control
81
 
82
Goals are Often Not Met
  • The majority of hypertension is not controlled
  • “A major obstacle is the reluctance of physicians to treat high BP early, intensively, and persistently”
  • “They” are blaming us!
83
Antihypertensive Drugs: Fixed-dose Combinations
  • Potential advantages:
  • Enhanced efficacy
  • Attenuated class-specific side effects
  • Improved compliance
  • Cost-effectiveness
84
 
85
 
86
Benefit of Multifactorial Interventions
87
Multiple CV Risk Management Results in Dramatic Reductions in CVD
88
BP control and events
89
Non-adherence to cardioprotective medications is associated with adverse outcomes
90
Improved Outcomes Achieved in Clinical
Trials with Higher Adherence