רפואת שיניים

דף הבית » רפואת שיניים » טיפולי שורש: סתימת שורש עם Thermafil

טיפולי שורש: סתימת שורש עם Thermafil

ביצוע סתימת שורש עם Thermafil מתברר כהרבה יותר יעיל מאשר דחיסה לטרלית .גם מבחינת החדירה לטובולי הדנטין .

לפניכם האבסטרקט:

International Endodontic Journal
Volume 37 Issue 10 Page 653 – October 2004
doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2004.00839.x

Effect of obturation technique on sealer cement thickness and dentinal tubule penetration

M. V. Weis, P. Parashos & H. H. Messer

Aim To compare the average sealer cement film thickness and the extent and pattern of sealer penetration into dentinal tubules in association with four obturation techniques in curved root canals.

Methodology Mesial canals of 44 extracted mandibular molars were randomly divided among the SimpliFill, continuous wave, Thermafil and 0.04 matched taper (master cones) lateral compaction obturation groups (22 canals per group). AH26 sealer cement was coloured blue-black using Sudan Black B dye. Roots were sectioned 1, 3 and 5 mm from the working length. Specimens were photographed under 25 magnification, mounted as 35 mm slides and projected. Average sealer cement thickness (measured at 10 points around the canal wall), depth of dentinal tubule penetration and frequency of voids were determined at the 1, 3 and 5 mm levels. Data were analysed statistically for effect of obturation technique and level of section on sealer thickness and on the depth and distribution of tubule penetration.

Results Thermafil demonstrated superior GP adaptation at all levels with a mean overall sealer cement thickness of 2.2 m, followed by lateral compaction (11.1 m), continuous wave (12.2 m) and SimpliFill (47.6 m). SimpliFill also demonstrated the highest frequency of voids (P < 0.05). Sealer cement penetrated dentinal tubules as far as the outer one-third of dentine, with greater penetration observed buccally or lingually (P < 0.001). Penetration was not significantly affected by obturation technique, but on average was deeper and more frequent at the 3 and 5 mm levels than at the 1 mm level (P < 0.001).

Conclusions Sealer thickness was strongly dependent on obturation technique. Assuming that minimal sealer thickness and fewer voids are good measures of long-term sealing ability, Thermafil resulted in the best outcome. Consistent, extensive sealer penetration into dentinal tubules was seen and was unrelated to the obturation technique

קטגוריות: חדשות

0 תגובות

השאירו תגובה

רוצה להצטרף לדיון?
תרגישו חופשי לתרום!

כתיבת תגובה לבטל

יש להתחבר למערכת כדי לכתוב תגובה.

מידע נוסף לעיונך

כתבות בנושאים דומים